Legal Opinion

Easton v. Chaffee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1941No. 28091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This case comes up on appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, notwithstanding the verdict of the jury, and from an order granting a new trial.

The principal question to be determined is whether the cause of action set up in the second amended complaint is grounded in fraud or upon a breach of contract. If the gist of the action rests upon breach of contract, it is barred by the statute of limitations. If the action grounds in fraud, the statute has not run against it, for the amended complaint contains allegations to the effect that plaintiff discovered the fraud…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Physicians' & Dentists' Business Bureau v. DrayWashington Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Singer Credit Corp. v. Mercer Island Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Hayes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Easton v. ChaffeeWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API