Legal Opinion

Easton v. Chaffee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1943No. 28823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— This action was instituted April 8,1939, to recover against defendant for damages claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff as a result of certain alleged fraudulent conduct of defendant. Trial of the cause to a jury culminated in a general verdict for the defendant, and an affirmative answer to a special interrogatory that a part of plaintiff’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. From judgment entered on the verdict, plaintiff appealed.

This cause was formerly tried and submitted to a jury upon the theory that fraud was the gist of the action. After reconsideration of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bay City Lumber Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Reeves v. John Davis & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Easton v. ChaffeeWashington Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Singer Credit Corp. v. Mercer Island Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Harrison v. a Bar a Ranch, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Fisk v. NewsumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API