Legal Opinion
Tatsch v. Hamilton-Erickson Manufacturing Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1966No. 7799PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
Frank Tatsch (plaintiff-appellee), a general contractor and the successful bidder for construction of a junior highr school at Bayard, New Mexico, recovered damages against Hamilton-Erickson Manufacturing Company (hereafter termed Hamilton) and John Barnes & Associates, Inc. (hereafter termed Barnes), its agent, for breach of contract in failing to furnish certain equipment needed in the school building. This appeal followed.
The plans and specifications required Tatsch to install twelve tables with benches and pockets, “as manufactured by Schieber Mfg. Co., Detroit 39,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Frederick Raff Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Polhamus v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Kamenjarin v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by18 opinions
- Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Stevenson v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- DeArmond v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Constructors Supply Co. v. Bostrom Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.