Ross v. Ringsby
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDREWS, Judge.
In this action appealing a judgment for plaintiff-appellee arising out of a claim of detainer and a counterclaim for specific performance on a contract, we are asked to resolve two questions. First, where the trial court, sitting without a jury, found a counter-offer did not operate as acceptance of a contract, was there sufficient evidence to support the finding? Second, if a contract did exist, should the trial court have allowed specific performance? These issues are to be resolved by our determination of whether terms which were altered in an acceptance of a contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mascarenas v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Totah Drilling Company v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Pugh v. PhelpsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
- Polhamus v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Pickett v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by9 opinions
- DeArmond v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Nani Koolau Co. v. K & M Construction, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
- Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.