Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ringsby

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1980No. 4226PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDREWS, Judge.

In this action appealing a judgment for plaintiff-appellee arising out of a claim of detainer and a counterclaim for specific performance on a contract, we are asked to resolve two questions. First, where the trial court, sitting without a jury, found a counter-offer did not operate as acceptance of a contract, was there sufficient evidence to support the finding? Second, if a contract did exist, should the trial court have allowed specific performance? These issues are to be resolved by our determination of whether terms which were altered in an acceptance of a contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mascarenas v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Totah Drilling Company v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Pugh v. PhelpsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Polhamus v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Pickett v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DeArmond v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Nani Koolau Co. v. K & M Construction, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API