Legal Opinion
In re Richard M.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 5, 1985No. 83-416PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
In this appeal from a ruling of the New Hampshire Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services (division), several issues have been raised with respect to the division’s decision that the plaintiff, Richard M., is not developmentally impaired and, *14therefore, is not eligible for services under RSA chapter 171-A (1977 and Supp. 1983). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
In summarizing the lengthy procedural and factual history of this case, we refer only to those facts necessary to a determination of the issues raised in this appeal.
In 1971, at the age of 15, Richard M. was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrill v. Great Bay Disposal Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Greenhalge v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Hamby v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- General Insulation Co. v. Eckman ConstructionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- In Re Alexis O.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- In re StrandellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.