Legal Opinion
Chasan v. Village District of Eastman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 8, 1986No. 86-081PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the granting by the Trial Court (DiClerieo, J.) of the defendants’ motion to dismiss their class action. They contend, inter alia, (1) that the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiffs did not establish the existence of contractual *811or equitable rights, (2) that certain taxes and charges imposed by the defendants are unreasonable and violative of part I, article 12 of the New Hampshire Constitution, and (3) that RSA 52:1 (Supp. 1985) and RSA 670:3 are unconstitutional as applied to this case. We affirm the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ action for the reasons…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Toltec Watershed Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chasan v. Village Dist. of EastmanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Panto v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.