Legal Opinion
In re Strandell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-051PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The petitioner, Brenda Strandell, petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review a decision of the New Hampshire Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services (the Division) upholding the validity of New Hampshire Administrative Rule He-M 503.07(c). The regulation establishes a priority waiting list for developmentally disabled persons who apply for, and are entitled to receive, certain habilitative services pursuant to RSA 171-AH3 (Supp. 1988), when such services are currently unavailable. The petitioner claims that the director of the Division erred: (1) in ruling that her…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. Department of Developmental ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Flanders v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Benjamin v. Devon BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- New Hampshire Health Care Ass'n v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- In re Craig T.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Delozier v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Petition of Chase Home for ChildrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- In re SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.