Legal Opinion

United States of America, Nisqually Indian Tribe and Puyallup Indian Tribe, Intervenors-Appellants v. State of Washington, Department of Fisheries

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1978No. 76-1112 and 76-1186PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

The district court, in the issuance of orders to enforce its decree in United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash. 1974), aff’d, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1086, 96 S.Ct. 877, 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976), ruled that the pink and chinook salmon fisheries lying wholly within reservations of the Puyallup and Nisqually tribes were subject to regulation by its decrees, and that the court had jurisdiction to order the tribes to curtail on-reservation fishing when necessary to effect court orders or to preserve the salmon runs. The Puyallup and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  2. Public Service Commission v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Shellman v. United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Judson H. Blount, Jr. v. State Bank & Trust Company, a North Carolina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. Laurence and Mary Bodkin v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Romero v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
  5. Romero v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API