Judson H. Blount, Jr. v. State Bank & Trust Company, a North Carolina Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Despite repeated inquiries from our Clerk, to which no response was made, the appellant’s counsel failed to comply with the briefing schedule of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Finally, after the appellee moved to dismiss the appeal, the appellant proposed to voluntarily dismiss under FRAP 42(b).
We believe, however, that voluntary dismissal is not appropriate when the appellee has been put to trouble and expense because the appellant has not complied with the rules of court. Accordingly, the appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. Costs on appeal are taxed against C. R. Wheatly,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- American Automobile Manufacturers Association v. Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Environmental ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Shellman v. United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Clarendon Ltd. v. Nu-West Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Nisqually Indian Tribe and Puyallup Indian Tribe, Intervenors-Appellants v. State of Washington, Department of FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.