Legal Opinion
New Haven Tile & Floor Covering Co. v. Roman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 23, 1951PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover of the defendants $195 as liquidated damages under an alleged contract providing that the plaintiff make certain repairs to a house in Branford for which the defendants would pay $650. The complaint further alleged a default under the contract by the defendants’ refusal to let' the plaintiff do the work. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.
The essential facts found by the court are not subject to correction and may be thus summarized: Joseph Sabo was the plaintiff’s agent for negotiating contracts to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Michels v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Olmstead v. MichelsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1888
- Cranfill v. Swann Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Klein v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Juengel Const. Co., Inc. v. Mt. Etna, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Pelletier v. SordoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Nice Ball Bearing Co. v. Bearing Jobbers, Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.