Guilford Lumber Manufacturing Co. v. Holladay
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, tried before Lane, <7.,, at February Term, 1919, of Guil-ford, upon exceptions to report of referee. Tbe court overruled tbe exceptions filed to tbe report by tbe defendant Armfield, and gave judgment against bim in favor of tbe Greensboro College for Women. Tbe defendant Armfield excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
This action was brought by plaintiffs, who are material-men, against tbe contractor Holladay, tbe Greensboro College for Women, wbicb owned tbe building, and one Armfield, surety on tbe contractor’s bond. Tbe plaintiffs were awarded judgment against tbe college, tbe owner of tbe building, for tbe amounts of tbeir claims, and tbe college was awarded judgment against tbe surety, Armfield, for tbe amount it is compelled to pay tbe plaintiffs. Tbe controversy is between tbe college and tbe defendant Armfield, surety upon tbe bond of Holladay, tbe contractor.
These facts were found by tbe referee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Graves v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- O'Kelly v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Bell v. HowertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Purvis v. CarstaphanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Schnepp v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re HL Gentry Construction CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Durham CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.