Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Schofield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1986No. 8526DC679PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant has appealed from the denial of her motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Though interlocutory, such a ruling is immediately appealable. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-277(b) (1983); Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc., 306 N.C. 324, 293 S.E. 2d 182 (1982).

To determine if foreign defendants may be subjected to personal jurisdiction in this State, we apply a two-pronged test. First, we determine whether North Carolina jurisdictional statutes allow our courts to entertain the action. Second, we determine whether our courts can constitutionally exercise such jurisdiction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Marion v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Miller v. KiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pries v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Church v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Church v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Stallings v. HahnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Tompkins v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API