Tompkins v. Tompkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The settled law of this State requires the application of a two-pronged test to determine whether personal jurisdiction maybe exercised over a foreign defendant. First, there must exist a statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction under the provisions of G.S. § 1-75.4, our long-arm statute. Second, the exercise of personal jurisdiction must comport with the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment, as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in International Shoe v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), and its progeny. Schofield v. Schofield, 78 N.C. App.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Liberty Finance Co. v. North Augusta Computer Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Powers v. ParisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Bates v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Tompkins v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990