Legal Opinion
Gupton v. Leavitt
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided June 18, 2008No. 3:07-cv-185PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEON JORDAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the court on the parties’ dispositive motions. The defendant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment” [doc. 7], to which the plaintiff has responded and filed a cross motion for summary judgment [docs. 14 and 15]. The defendant has filed a response to the plaintiffs cross motion and a reply [doc. 18]. The court finds that oral argument is not necessary, and the motions are ripe for the court’s consideration. For the reasons discussed below, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Friedman v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Friedman v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010