Legal Opinion

Chase v. Michigan United Railways Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Ejectment by Charles H. Chase against the Michigan United Railways Company. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is a case in ejectment where a judgment was entered for plaintiff on a verdict directed in his favor by the court, and is brought to this cotírt upon writ of error for review.

The statement of facts made by defendant and appellant in its brief will be considered by the court as sufficient and accurate, the plaintiff and appellee not having pointed out anything to the contrary, as provided by rule No. 40 of this court. The property in dispute is a portion of the right of way of defendant street railway company as it passes through College Grove, located in Meridian town*495ship, Ingham county,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. School-district No. One v. Union School-district No. OneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chase v. AngellMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Wheat v. Van TineMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Michigan Central Railroad v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parsons v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API