School-district No. One v. Union School-district No. One
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Bill to restrain defendant district from exercising juris•diction over certain territory formerly belonging to complainant, and for an accounting. All parties appeal from a decree granting the injunctive relief prayed for, but •denying an accounting. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This controversy grows out of a claim made by the complainant that the defendant school-district, without warrant of law, has since the year 1881, to and including the year 1886, extended assessment for taxes *340over certain territory which, the complainant district now claims as a part of the territory lying and being within its boundaries, and that the taxes so levied were collected by the township treasurer for those years, and turned over to the school fund of the defendant district. The bill is filed for an accounting for moneys so assessed and collected amounting to over $1,000, and for an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brooks v. FairchildMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by11 opinions
- German Ins. Co. of Freeport v. Independent School. Dist. of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- County Board of Education v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Board of Education v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Kockrow v. WhisenandNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Leasure v. BeebeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.