Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Hoffman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1958No. Docket 19, 20, Calendar 47,132, 47,133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff Parsons was the owner and operator of an automobile and plaintiff Keyser was a passenger therein when it was struck in the rear by an automobile owned and driven by defendant. Plaintiffs sued for resulting damages, the cases were combined for trial, and a jury returned verdicts of no cause for action. Prom orders denying motions for new trials, plaintiffs appeal.

There is conflicting testimony as to how the accident occurred. While we might share the view of the trial court, expressed in his statement that had he been the trier of the facts he might well have reached a different…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Leonard Refineries, Inc. v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Zebell v. KrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sheffer v. FleischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Chase v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lober v. SklarMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Yarabek v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rueger v. HamlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Yarabek v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API