Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Hejhal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 1, 1930No. Gen. No. 33,688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

By this appeal complainants question the propriety of a decree dismissing, after hearing, their bill of complaint which sought a mandatory injunction enjoining defendants from erecting or maintaining a building alleged to be erected in violation of certain building restrictions contained in a deed and of the zoning ordinance of the City of Berwyn.

Neither the City of Berwyn nor William Kramer, building commissioner, has filed an answer to the bill. We shall hereafter designate Rudolph J. Hejhal and Marie Hejhal as defendants. Their answer denied that their premises were subject to the alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ewertsen v. GerstenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bondy v. SamuelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People ex rel. Beardsley v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wiegman v. KuselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Curtis v. RubinIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Deer Park Civic Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  3. Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Lake Shore Riding Academy, Inc. v. DaleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Hagee v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API