Legal Opinion
Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 1994No. 14920PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
This is an action to enjoin the operation of a quarry. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment by the trial court in favor of the defendants, denying the injunctive relief. The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the verified complaint sufficiently alleged as a ground for injunctive relief that the defendants, October Twenty-Four, Inc., and A. Aiudi and Sons,1 were oper*624ating a quarry in a single family residential zone in violation of the town zoning regulations; and (2) if so, whether the plaintiff, William Dornfried, the zoning enforcement officer for the town of Plainville, should have been…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.