Legal Opinion

Hagee v. City of Evanston

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1980No. 79-1648PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Plaintiffs brought an action seeking to enjoin the city of Evanston from revoking a building permit and refusing to issue occupancy permits. The trial court held that Evanston was estopped from revoking the permit and granted the relief requested on the condition that Hagee comply with requirements set forth in the order. Evanston appeals.

On appeal, Evanston contends that (1) it was not estopped to revoke the permits, and (2) plaintiffs were precluded by the Administrative Review Act from seeking injunctive relief.

We affirm.

Joseph Hagee (Hagee), Reed Mitchell Hagee and Raymond Jump planned to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ganley v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Ehrlich v. Village of WilmetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph Hagee, Reed Mitchell Hagee and Raymond Jump v. City of Evanston, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Williams v. Office of the Chief Judge of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. City of Chicago v. RoppoloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Levine v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Hagee v. City of EvanstonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API