Legal Opinion

Stotts v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1951PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by Arthur Johnston (erroneously entered in the title of this case as Art Johnson), one of the two defendants, from a decree of the Circuit Court. The suit which culminated in the decree was instituted by the plaintiff-respondent, Roy O. Stotts, *407for the purpose of obtaining the foreclosure of a bill of sale alleged to be, in truth, a chattel mortgage. That instrument described a tractor owned by Earl L. Marshall, one of the two defendants, who was the transferor in the bill of sale. The plaintiff was the transferee. The complaint alleged that the bill of sale was executed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Barber v. Motor Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Griffith v. HanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Community Bank v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Van Natta v. Nys & EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lawrence Whse., Inc. v. Best Lbr. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Piazza ex rel. Piazza v. KellimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Johnston v. EarleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API