Legal Opinion

People v. Schultz

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1967No. Crim. 5921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Convicted of pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i), defendant was sentenced to prison. Execution of sentence was suspended and she was admitted to probation on condition, among others, that she serve one year in county jail. She appealed, and was released on bail pending appellate determination. The judgment was affirmed (People v. Schultz, 238 Cal.App.2d 804 [48 Cal.Rptr. 328]) and defendant commenced service of the one year in jail. A new charge had been filed against her charging that she again engaged in pandering after the trial court judgment and before remittitur. The district attorney moved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CooperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Venable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Faulk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API