Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Stepke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
As appears from the foregoing statement of facts, conveyances were set aside as fraudulent against creditors and the properties conveyed to the defendant daughter of the two other defendants were subjected to the creditors’ claims. The findings of fact are attacked as against the clear weight and great preponderance of the evidence.
The finding of fraudulent intent of the parents must be sustained as supported by the evidence. The court stated in an opinion filed that the testimony of all three Stepkes, especially in view of their demeanor on the stand, “must be disregarded as utterly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Dondis v. LashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Barnes v. Buffalo Pitts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Davis v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Neubauer v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- General Electric Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Town of Wauwatosa v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.