Russell v. Municipality of Anchorage
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Ronald Russell was convicted of driving while intoxicated and driving with a blood-alcohol level exceeding .10, Anchorage Municipal Code § 9.28.020(A) (hereinafter cited as AMC). He appeals, contending that his seizure and subsequent arrest violated his rights under the state and federal constitutions, and that the trial court erred in admitting expert evidence regarding a blood-alcohol test performed at Russell’s request. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 6, 1983, at approximately 5:20 a.m., Officers Cooper and Roseman observed an occupied vehicle in an Anchorage parking lot.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- McCoy v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. GoetaskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- St. John v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
- Skuse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
- Mat-Su Valley Medical Center, LLC v. BolinderAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.