Skuse v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Donald H. Skuse was convicted of refusal to submit to a chemical test, AS 28.35.-032(a). He appeals, in propria persona. We affirm.
The primary question on appeal is whether the trial court’s denial of Skuse’s re quest that he be represented by a lay person at trial was either (a) a denial of his constitutional right to counsel or (b) an abuse of discretion.
At his arraignment before Magistrate Brigitte McBride, Skuse informed the court that he would be representing himself. He also gave his written consent to trial before a magistrate (in this case, a nonlawyer). 1
Three…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
- Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Annas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
- Ferguson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Arnett v. BaskousAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.