Legal Opinion

Merchants National Bank v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

The note in suit is payable to the plaintiff bank at its place of business in St. Johnsbury, and is signed by Cutting and indorsed, waiving demand and notice, by Carpenter. It was unpaid at maturity, and this action was brought against the maker and the indorser, and has resulted in a verdict and judgment against both of them. Carpenter alone has filed a bill of exceptions and is hereinafter referred to as the defendant.

Upon argument it was found that the defendant’s brief failed to point out with sufficient clearness the exceptions relied upon, and his counsel, by leave of court, filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Wentworth v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Grapes v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Callahan, B.N.F. v. DisordaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Chaffee's Sons v. Estate of BlanchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Henry Waterhouse Trust Co. v. RawlinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API