Legal Opinion

Grapes v. Willoughby

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 9, 1919PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Action of Contract to recover upon a promissory note in-, dorsed by the defendant above the name of the plaintiff. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the June Term, 1918, Caledonia County, Slack, J., presiding. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the Court directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

B. 0. Cote bought of this plaintiff a stock of merchandise, giving as part payment therefor his promissory note for $1,000 payable at and to the order of the Lyndonville National Bank at a time stated. Before this note was delivered to the- plaintiff, the defendant, Willoughby, had written his name across the back of it. The plaintiff took the note to the bank and, having written his name across the back of it, under that of the defendant, received the avails of it by way of credit or otherwise. This note was renewed from time to time, and the note in suit fell due on January 29, 1918. On all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mechanics' & Farmers' Savings Bank v. KatterjohnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Castonguay v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Server v. LangSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. Gibbs v. GuaragliaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  5. Lightner v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  4. Nichols v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Capital Garage Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API