Legal Opinion

Henry Waterhouse Trust Co. v. Rawlins

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1936No. 2179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COUBT BY

COKE, C. J. (Circuit Judge Metzger, dissenting.)

Henry Waterhouse Trust Company, Limited, plaintiff, instituted its action in the court below against Millie F. Rawlins, defendant, to recover on a promissory note alalleged to have been executed by defendant to plaintiff as payee and upon which at the date the suit was instituted, to wit, September 19, 1933, there was a balance of $6625.25 due, with interest at seven per cent from November 21, 1930. The note bears the date of November 21, 1925, and was originally for $7085.25.

To the complaint defendant interposed an answer…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  2. Nalitzky v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  3. Lincoln Court Realty Co. v. Kentucky Title Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Bassick v. Ætna Explosives Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  5. Commercial National Bank v. Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sung Wha Kim Lyu v. ShinnHawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Grace v. KumalaaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Grace v. KumalaaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API