State v. Gorman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for Hennepin county for the crimé of assault in the second degree. The case was tried before Dickinson, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of guilty under the circumstances stated in the opinion. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was indicted and convicted in the district court of the county of Hennepin of an assault in the second degree, and it was adjudged that as punishment therefor he be confined at hard labor in the state’s prison for a term of five years. He appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The appeal does not involve any question of the sufficiency of the evidence to establish his guilt, or any error in his trial up to the time the jury, through the officer in charge of them, notified the court that they had agreed upon a verdict. The alleged error relied upon for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sahlinger v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- State v. WaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Frey v. Calhoun Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. La BarberaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Thomas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.