Commonwealth v. McCarthy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.
The defendant was indicted and tried for larceny in a building. He was on bail, and it must be assumed that he was present during the trial all the time until after the jury had retired to consider the case, when he voluntarily went away and remained absent until after they had returned with their verdict. He was then defaulted, and a verdict of guilty was received and recorded. He afterward moved to set aside the verdict, on the ground that the court could not properly receive it in his absence. This motion presents the only question in the case.
It is a general rule, both in England and in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maurer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Price v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- People v. PerkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1828
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. BergstromMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- State v. SlorahSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- People v. La BarberaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- State v. WaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.