Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 22, 1943No. 6 Div. 127PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in a capital case, but in which the punishment was fixed at fourteen years in the penitentiary.

The question which the Attorney General seeks to have reviewed is the holding that the judgment should be reversed on the ground that as amended it shows that the defendant was-not personally present in court when the jury handed their sealed verdict to a regular bailiff of the court, though he was present as were his counsel when the court received and read it. There is an agreement as to the facts material here to mention, as follows:

“…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Noell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  4. People v. La BarberaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. McMillian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Ex Parte BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API