Legal Opinion

Faber v. Seneca Cty. Sheriff's Dept.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2018No. 13–17–29PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLAMOWSKI, P.J.,

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Eric A. Faber ("Eric"), Robert E. Faber, and Martha J. Faber appeal the judgment of the Seneca County Court of Common Pleas (1) for granting appellees' 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss; and (2) for finding the appellants' claim for injunctive relief to be moot. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} On January 10, 2017, the appellants filed a complaint that named the Seneca County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff William E. Eckelberry ("Sheriff Eckelberry") as defendants. Doc. 2.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. LeRoy v. Allen, Yurasek & MerklinOhio Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lima Refining Co. v. Linde Gas N. Am., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Lewis v. Ayersville Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Martens v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Price v. Aspen DentalOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Souders v. U.S. Bank Natl. Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API