Roose v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
In this case, appellant Rodger Roose appeals pro se from a conviction of burglary.
We affirm in part and reverse in part. Appellant’s issues on appeal are summarized as follows:
1. Whether appellant was denied his right of self-representation; and
2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it:
a. Refused to give appellant probation;
b. Sentenced appellant to be imprisoned for a period of not less than nine years, 11 months, and 29 days nor more than ten years in the Wyoming State Penitentiary; or
c. Provided in its sentence that the term imposed upon appellant in this case…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Keller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Van Riper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Cardenas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Kavanaugh v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.