Legal Opinion

United States v. Articles of Animal Drug Containing Diethylstilbestrol

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided November 4, 1981No. Civ. 80-0-309PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCHATZ, District Judge.

This in rem civil action was commenced on May 7, 1980, by the United States of America (hereinafter United States or government) pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (hereinafter the Act), 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The government seeks a decree, pursuant to 21 U.S. C.A. § 334(a)(1), condemning as adulterated certain articles of animal drug containing diethylstilbestrol (hereinafter DES). More specifically, the complaint alleges that the articles proceeded against are adulterated while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Cassaro, Inc., and Salvatore CassaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. H. Ray Evers, M. D., an Individual, Doing Business as Ra-Mar Clinic, Ann H. Garrett, Defendants-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Torigian Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. United States v. Articles of DrugDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1986
  3. United States v. Rhody Dairy, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  4. United States v. Articles of DrugDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API