Legal Opinion

United States v. Torigian Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 18, 1984No. 81 Cr. 598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

BARTELS, Senior District Judge.

This criminal prosecution under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 331(a), (k), resulted in a verdict by Magistrate Caden that the defendants, Torigian Laboratories, Inc., and Puzant C. Torigian, were guilty of all eighteen counts of the information with which they were charged.

In or about October, 1976, the defendants received intraocular lenses from Copeland Intra Lenses, Inc. for the purposes of sterilization, individual packaging in vials and labeling. After performing the work, the defendants sent the lenses…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Albert Slater v. Optical Radiation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Rheinecker v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  5. United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished DevicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API