United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
Section 301 (k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act prohibits the “alteration, mutilation, destruction, obliteration, or removal of the whole or any part of the labeling of, or the doing of any other act with respect to, a food, drug, device, or cosmetic, if such act is done while such article is held for sale . . . after shipment in interstate commerce and results in such article being adulterated or misbranded.” Section 402 of the Act provides, among other things, that “[a] food shall be deemed to be adulterated — (a) ... (3) if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. KocmondCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1962
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Charles B. Bradley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- People v. RostadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Larry Leon Chaney v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Harry F. SeussCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.