Legal Opinion

Citizens Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 2003No. 86-CV-0069-33; A119140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendants Thomas A. McDonald and Marion F. McDonald moved to set aside a judgment, arguing that it was not renewed in a timely manner and that it therefore was void. The trial court denied the motion. Defendants appeal, again asserting that the renewal judgment is void for lack of timely renewal. We agree and vacate the judgment.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. In May 1985, defendants entered into an agreement with Citizens Savings and Loan Association (Citizens) to buy property in Jefferson County known as the Norton Ranch. The purchase price was $1,407,165, to be paid by defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, MULTNOMAH COUNTY v. NilsenOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Nendel v. MeyersOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hood River County v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Estate of Hutchins v. FargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Oregon Recovery, LLC v. Lake Forest Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API