Legal Opinion

Estate of Hutchins v. Fargo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2003No. 93CV3003; A117086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Selmar Hutchins held the vendor’s interest in property in which Michael Fargo held the vendee’s interest. Fargo then sold the property to appellant Max Mills, who did not maintain the required payments. After Hutchins’s death, his estate obtained a judgment of foreclosure against Fargo and 10 “John Does.” Mills subsequently moved for an order vacating that judgment. The trial court dismissed his motion on the ground that he “did not have standing to assert the issues he has raised.” We reverse and remand.

Most of the facts are uncontested; for the purposes of this opinion we accept the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hughes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Seguin v. Maloney-Chambers Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kevin Turner v. Stephanie D. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. West Suburban Bank v. Advantage Financial Partners, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Speciality Risk Services v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. MAN Aktiengesellschaft v. DaimlerChrysler AGCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API