Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Shannon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1979No. C-780360PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The error asserted in appellant’s single assignment of error is that the trial court unconstitutionally imposed a sentence of thirty days incarceration on him for a violation of the Cincinnati ordinance against reckless driving. Appellant (the defendant in the trial court) pleaded no contest to the charge of violating Cincinnati Municipal Code Section 506-6, and the penalties imposed were thirty days of confinement in the Community Correctional Institution, a fine of $250 and costs. This was the maximum punishment under C.M.C. 506-6 and 512-6. Under the state statute against reckless driving,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Salsburg v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. BuckleyOhio Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. BishopOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. City of Toledo v. WacenskeOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Santer v. Globe Publications, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API