Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants' National Bank v. Bailie

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1934No. Civ. No. 8979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to terminate defendant’s rights under a written lease' and to quiet plaintiffs’ title to the premises described therein.

The lease was for a term of ninety-nine years commencing on June 1, 1923, and was executed by Edward Caswell, now deceased, and Minnie M. Caswell, his wife, to Roy C. Bailie (who will be hereinafter referred to as the lessee). In addition to all taxes and assessments levied on the property after the date of the lease the lessee agreed to pay upon its execution the sum of $350 as rental for the month of June, 1923, and the same amount on the first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Central Oil Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Skaggs v. EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNeny v. TouchstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Linn v. WeinraubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Schoen-McAllister Co. v. Oak Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API