Legal Opinion

Kuttroff v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 28, 1924No. 2347PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Fifty pounds of azoflavine, a coal-tar dye, imported at Rouses Point, N. Y., on November 1, 1922, was entered at a total United States value of $80.15, or at a unit United States value of $1.603 per pound. The goods were assessed for duty under that part of paragraph 28 of the tariff act of 1922 which reads as follows:

Par. 28. Coal-tar products: All colors, dyes, or stains, * * * 45 per centum ad valorem based upon the American selling price (as defined in subdivision (f) of section 402, Title IY) of any similar, competitive article manufactured or produced in the United States, and 7 cents…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Veazie Bank v. FennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. RichardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Kuttoff, Pickhardt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Sandoz Chemical Works v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Kuttroff-Pickhardt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API