Legal Opinion
A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided October 27, 1965No. Reap. Dec. 11095; Entry No. 961416, etcPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in these appeals, consolidated at the trial, consists of footwear with cotton canvas uppers and with soles in chief value of rubber or substitutes for rubber, imported from Japan during the years 1958, 1959, and 1960. In accordance with Presidential Proclamation No. 2027, dated February 1, 1933, 63 Treas. Dec. 232, T.D. 46158, and in view of the fact that this merchandise was included in the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, 70 Stat. 948, 93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, it was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Kuttroff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. Japan Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Kuttroff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Hoyt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Aldrich Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Empire Findings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966