Legal Opinion

Oswald v. LeGrand

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 12, 1990No. 89-166PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal challenges a grant of summary judgment for medical professionals in a case involving the spontaneous abortion of a 19-22 week-old fetus. The trial court barred the plaintiffs from introducing expert testimony due to their failure to timely designate an expert in accordance with Iowa Code section 668.11(2) (1987). Accordingly, the district court determined that plaintiffs could not generate a material issue of fact concerning the defendants’ negligence. Because we conclude that expert testimony is crucial to some but not all of plaintiffs’ claims, we affirm in part,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NottgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Niblo v. Parr Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Mentzer v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Vaughn v. Ag Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API