Legal Opinion

Niblo v. Parr Manufacturing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-1531PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

In this retaliatory discharge case, employee Rose Marie Niblo recovered damages for loss of wages and emotional distress. The employer, Parr Manufacturing, Inc., challenges the allowance of damages for emotional distress arising out of this tort. If such damages are recoverable, it urges that the distress must be severe. Parr also claims plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to establish a claim for wrongful discharge. We affirm.

Plaintiff began her employment with defendant in June, 1985. She worked with plastisol, a chemical which is used to cohere the parts of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Teachout v. Forest City Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API