Kane v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court.
This action was brought under the uniform declaratory judgments act (M. S. A. c. 555) for a judgment declaring certain lots to be free and clear of a certain restrictive covenant. The real estate involved is situated in the city of St. Paul and is described as follows:
Lots one (1), two (2) and three (3), block six (6), West End-Edgcumbe, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the register of deeds of Ramsey county.
In 1937, these lots, with other property, were forfeited to the state of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Bryant v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Gilbert v. EmersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- McDaniel v. MaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Burke v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- United States v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
- Palatine National Bank of Palatine v. Strom (In Re Strom)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Petition of WillmusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.