Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
On appeal after a prior remand in this land-dispute case, appellant landowners argue that the district court erred by (1) granting summary judgment in favor of respondent city because either the road deviation is exempted from the user statute as a “platted city street” or because statutory and common-law dedication cannot be applied to Torrens properties, and (2) denying their motion for summary judgment on their trespass and ejectment claims. We affirm the district court’s denial of appellants’ summary-judgment motion. But because we conclude that statutory dedication is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- EEP Workers' Compensation Fund v. Fun & Sun, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015