Legal Opinion

United States v. EZ Lynk, SEZC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01986Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 3/28/2 024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-cv-1986 (MKV) Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER -v- GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART EZ LYNK SEZC, BRADLEY GINTZ, MOTION TO DISMISS PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE SEZC, and AND DENYING THOMAS WOOD, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, District Judge: This case is chiefly about whether Defendants can be held liable under Section 203 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), which prohibits the manufacture and sale of devices used to defeat…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API