Legal Opinion

Steingold v. Seaton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 14, 1948No. Record No. 3343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, by decree entered on the 13th day of September, 1944, in the chancery cause of Emmett T. Seaton, etc., complainant, versus Samuel L. Swindell, individually and trading as Princess Laundry, respondent, appointed Samuel A. Steingold receiver for the respondent. The Princess Laundry, then owned by respondent, was a going concern. The receiver was empowered to continue its operation to' the end that upon selling it a more profitable disposition and liquidation might be made. He gave bond, entered upon his duties as receiver, undertook the operation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross Cutter & Silo Co. v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Nethers v. NethersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Potts v. FlippenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Claud v. PulleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Carney v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bacigalupo v. FlemingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  2. Larchmont Properties, Inc. v. CoopermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Dudley v. Florence Drug Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API