Legal Opinion

Bacigalupo v. Fleming

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 10, 1958No. Record 4769PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

Thurman Fleming, sometimes hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, filed a motion for judgment against Leo Bacigalupo and Edythe H. Bacigalupo, husband and wife, to recover the sum of $3,593, alleged to be due plaintiff “by reason of a certain contract * * *, whereby defendants employed plaintiff as supervisor to manage the construction of a certain house in Henrico County, Virginia.” A copy of the contract was filed with the motion.

Defendants filed grounds of defense asserting that all sums due plaintiff had been paid. Subsequent to a mistrial, they filed amended and supplemental grounds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Massie v. DudleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. F. S. Bowen Electric Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  3. Rohanna v. VazzanaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  4. Hancock Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Hyson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Mesker Brothers Iron Company v. Donata Corporation, a & H Holding Corporation and a & H Plumbing Supply CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  3. Concrete Ready-Mix of Lynchburg, Inc. v. County Green Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1977
  4. Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. J. W. Woolard Mechanical & Plumbing, Inc. v. Jones Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API