Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Phillips

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1954No. Civ. 19956PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal for failure of the amended complaint to state a cause of action.

Plaintiffs initiated a suit in equity against the heirs of Mary Virginia Jones, in which they sought quasi-specific performance of an alleged oral agreement by Mary Virginia Jones to make a will leaving to plaintiffs all property she owned at the time of her death, and to impress a trust upon the property left by Mrs. Jones, who died intestate, for the use and benefit of plaintiffs. The public administrator, originally made a party defendant, was dismissed upon the ground of improper…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Gene Hancock Construction Co. v. Kempton & Snedigar DairyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Zakk v. Diesel, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Kennedy v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Parker v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API